RTX A2000 12 GB vs Radeon RX 590

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 590 with RTX A2000 12 GB, including specs and performance data.

RX 590
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 175 Watt
24.33

RTX A2000 12 GB outperforms RX 590 by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking227139
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.4287.76
Power efficiency9.6335.10
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 30GA106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date15 November 2018 (5 years ago)23 November 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX A2000 12 GB has 245% better value for money than RX 590.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23043328
Core clock speed1469 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate222.5124.8
Floating-point processing power7.119 TFLOPS7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs144104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm167 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 590 24.33
RTX A2000 12 GB 35.48
+45.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 590 9390
RTX A2000 12 GB 13692
+45.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD98
−42.9%
140−150
+42.9%
1440p56
−42.9%
80−85
+42.9%
4K37
−35.1%
50−55
+35.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.853.21
1440p4.985.61
4K7.548.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65
−38.5%
90−95
+38.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 86
−39.5%
120−130
+39.5%
Battlefield 5 136
−39.7%
190−200
+39.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 69
−44.9%
100−105
+44.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Far Cry 5 90
−44.4%
130−140
+44.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 90
−44.4%
130−140
+44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 274
−27.7%
350−400
+27.7%
Hitman 3 45−50
−42.9%
70−75
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 301
−32.9%
400−450
+32.9%
Metro Exodus 124
−45.2%
180−190
+45.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 91
−42.9%
130−140
+42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140
−42.9%
200−210
+42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 272
−28.7%
350−400
+28.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 113
−41.6%
160−170
+41.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 73
−37%
100−105
+37%
Battlefield 5 122
−39.3%
170−180
+39.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 64
−40.6%
90−95
+40.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Far Cry 5 74
−35.1%
100−105
+35.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 71
−40.8%
100−105
+40.8%
Forza Horizon 4 259
−35.1%
350−400
+35.1%
Hitman 3 45−50
−42.9%
70−75
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 287
−39.4%
400−450
+39.4%
Metro Exodus 97
−44.3%
140−150
+44.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 74
−35.1%
100−105
+35.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 114
−40.4%
160−170
+40.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−41.5%
75−80
+41.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 261
−34.1%
350−400
+34.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 39
−41%
55−60
+41%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 62
−45.2%
90−95
+45.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 46
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Far Cry 5 55
−45.5%
80−85
+45.5%
Forza Horizon 4 91
−42.9%
130−140
+42.9%
Hitman 3 45−50
−42.9%
70−75
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 96
−35.4%
130−140
+35.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100
−40%
140−150
+40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 64
−40.6%
90−95
+40.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−35.1%
50−55
+35.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55
−45.5%
80−85
+45.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 38
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−43.9%
200−210
+43.9%
Hitman 3 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 72
−38.9%
100−105
+38.9%
Metro Exodus 58
−37.9%
80−85
+37.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70
−42.9%
100−105
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 203
−42.9%
290−300
+42.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 43
−39.5%
60−65
+39.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 39
−41%
55−60
+41%
Far Cry New Dawn 26
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Hitman 3 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 57
−40.4%
80−85
+40.4%
Metro Exodus 36
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 19
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20
−35%
27−30
+35%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 17
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Forza Horizon 4 46
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 13
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%

This is how RX 590 and RTX A2000 12 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 43% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 43% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 35% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.33 35.48
Recency 15 November 2018 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 70 Watt

RTX A2000 12 GB has a 45.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The RTX A2000 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 590 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 590 is a desktop card while RTX A2000 12 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 590
Radeon RX 590
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
RTX A2000 12 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 2432 votes

Rate Radeon RX 590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 135 votes

Rate RTX A2000 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.