Arc Graphics 130V vs Radeon RX 590

Place in the ranking	232	412
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	24.35	no data
Power efficiency	9.61	no data
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Xe² (2025)
GPU code name	Polaris 30	Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	15 November 2018 (6 years ago)	no data
Launch price (MSRP)	$279	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	7
Core clock speed	1469 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1545 MHz	1850 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	222.5	no data
Floating-point processing power	7.119 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	144	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	256.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	no data
HDMI	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12_2
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 590 24.42
+108%

Arc Graphics 130V 11.74

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 590 9387
+108%

Arc Graphics 130V 4512

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 590 23363
+145%

Arc Graphics 130V 9523

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 590 16814
+104%

Arc Graphics 130V 8255

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	102 +219%	32 −219%
1440p	61 +126%	27−30 −126%
4K	37 +131%	16−18 −131%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.74	no data
1440p	4.57	no data
4K	7.54	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +9.8%	41 −9.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +133%	21−24 −133%
Elden Ring	80−85 +135%	30−35 −135%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	87 +129%	35−40 −129%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +45.2%	31 −45.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +133%	21−24 −133%
Forza Horizon 4	137 +93%	71 −93%
Metro Exodus	88 +175%	30−35 −175%
Red Dead Redemption 2	91 +203%	30−33 −203%
Valorant	128 +184%	45−50 −184%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	129 +239%	35−40 −239%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +60.7%	28 −60.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +133%	21−24 −133%
Dota 2	52 +26.8%	41 −26.8%
Elden Ring	80−85 +135%	30−35 −135%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +171%	28 −171%
Fortnite	116 +73.1%	65−70 −73.1%
Forza Horizon 4	114 +96.6%	58 −96.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	79 +88.1%	40−45 −88.1%
Metro Exodus	60 +87.5%	30−35 −87.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	239 +172%	85−90 −172%
Red Dead Redemption 2	39 +30%	30−33 −30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +126%	35−40 −126%
Valorant	64 +42.2%	45−50 −42.2%
World of Tanks	250−260 +57.4%	160−170 −57.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	71 +86.8%	35−40 −86.8%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +80%	25 −80%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +133%	21−24 −133%
Dota 2	80−85 +110%	40−45 −110%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +65.2%	45−50 −65.2%
Forza Horizon 4	100 +108%	48 −108%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	79 −11.4%	85−90 +11.4%
Valorant	110 +144%	45−50 −144%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	40−45 +173%	14−16 −173%
Elden Ring	40−45 +153%	16−18 −153%
Grand Theft Auto V	40−45 +156%	16−18 −156%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +119%	80−85 −119%
Red Dead Redemption 2	25 +150%	10−11 −150%
World of Tanks	160−170 +95.2%	80−85 −95.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +113%	21−24 −113%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −90.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 +122%	9−10 −122%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +173%	24−27 −173%
Forza Horizon 4	70 +159%	27−30 −159%
Metro Exodus	58 +142%	24−27 −142%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +150%	14−16 −150%
Valorant	75 +159%	27−30 −159%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
Dota 2	41 +86.4%	21−24 −86.4%
Elden Ring	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%
Grand Theft Auto V	41 +86.4%	21−24 −86.4%
Metro Exodus	19 +171%	7−8 −171%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	82 +141%	30−35 −141%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16 +100%	8−9 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	41 +86.4%	21−24 −86.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30 +173%	10−12 −173%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Dota 2	40−45 +133%	18−20 −133%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +129%	14−16 −129%
Fortnite	34 +162%	12−14 −162%
Forza Horizon 4	40 +167%	14−16 −167%
Valorant	39 +225%	12−14 −225%

This is how RX 590 and Arc Graphics 130V compete in popular games:

RX 590 is 219% faster in 1080p
RX 590 is 126% faster in 1440p
RX 590 is 131% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 590 is 267% faster.
in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc Graphics 130V is 11% faster.

All in all, in popular games: