CMP 40HX vs Radeon RX 5800 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated305
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data19.01
Power efficiencyno data6.60
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 23TU106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)25 February 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores33282304
Core clock speedno data1470 MHz
Boost clock speed1775 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistorsno data10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt185 Watt
Texture fill rate369.2237.6
Floating-point processing power11.81 TFLOPS7.603 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs208144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 185 Watt

RX 5800 XT has a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

CMP 40HX, on the other hand, has 48.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5800 XT and CMP 40HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5800 XT is a desktop card while CMP 40HX is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5800 XT
Radeon RX 5800 XT
NVIDIA CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 204 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 32 votes

Rate CMP 40HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.