Radeon RX Vega XL vs RX 580

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking244not rated
Place by popularity1not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.55no data
Power efficiency8.51no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 20Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)8 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23043584
Core clock speed1257 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1340 MHz1630 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)185 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate193.0365.1
Floating-point processing power6.175 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3264
TMUs144224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1890 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s483.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12.0
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 8 August 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 185 Watt 225 Watt

RX 580 has 21.6% lower power consumption.

RX Vega XL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 580 and Radeon RX Vega XL. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 580
Radeon RX 580
AMD Radeon RX Vega XL
Radeon RX Vega XL

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 19677 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX Vega XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.