GeForce GT 710 vs Radeon RX 580 Mobile

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 580 Mobile with GeForce GT 710, including specs and performance data.

RX 580 Mobile
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
16.75
+1096%

RX 580 Mobile outperforms GT 710 by a whopping 1096% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking303971
Place by popularitynot in top-10063
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.420.04
Power efficiency13.295.84
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code namePolaris 20GK208
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)27 March 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$301.69 $34.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 580 Mobile has 53450% better value for money than GT 710.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304192
Core clock speed1000 MHz954 MHz
Boost clock speed1077 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt19 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data95 °C
Texture fill rate155.115.26
Floating-point processing power4.963 TFLOPS0.3663 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs14416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Heightno data2.713" (6.9 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA
Multi monitor supportno data3 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision-+
PureVideo-+
PhysX-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 580 Mobile 16.75
+1096%
GT 710 1.40

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 580 Mobile 11261
+1089%
GT 710 947

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 580 Mobile 69325
+854%
GT 710 7270

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 580 Mobile 290090
+312%
GT 710 70459

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD77
+863%
8
−863%
1440p35−40
+1067%
3
−1067%
4K30
+329%
7
−329%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.92
+11.6%
4.37
−11.6%
1440p8.62
+35.3%
11.66
−35.3%
4K10.06
−101%
5.00
+101%
  • RX 580 Mobile has 12% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 580 Mobile has 35% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GT 710 has 101% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+1100%
4−5
−1100%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+1200%
8−9
−1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+1100%
4−5
−1100%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+2433%
3−4
−2433%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+1200%
8−9
−1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+1140%
5
−1140%
Fortnite 183
+3560%
5−6
−3560%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+838%
8−9
−838%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 69
+590%
10−11
−590%
Valorant 130−140
+286%
35−40
−286%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+1100%
4−5
−1100%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+2433%
3−4
−2433%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+1200%
8−9
−1200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+579%
30−35
−579%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%
Dota 2 76
+280%
20
−280%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+1450%
4
−1450%
Fortnite 81
+1520%
5−6
−1520%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+838%
8−9
−838%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+589%
9
−589%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+1200%
3
−1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 57
+470%
10−11
−470%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+1260%
5
−1260%
Valorant 130−140
+286%
35−40
−286%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+2433%
3−4
−2433%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%
Dota 2 69
+283%
18
−283%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+1450%
4
−1450%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+838%
8−9
−838%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41
+310%
10−11
−310%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+1133%
3
−1133%
Valorant 130−140
+286%
35−40
−286%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60
+1100%
5−6
−1100%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+1220%
10−11
−1220%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+1450%
2−3
−1450%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+1093%
14−16
−1093%
Valorant 170−180
+2088%
8−9
−2088%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+1200%
4−5
−1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+1050%
4−5
−1050%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+120%
14−16
−120%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Valorant 100−110
+1188%
8−9
−1188%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1
Dota 2 60−65
+800%
7
−800%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+1500%
2−3
−1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14
+367%
3−4
−367%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%

This is how RX 580 Mobile and GT 710 compete in popular games:

  • RX 580 Mobile is 863% faster in 1080p
  • RX 580 Mobile is 1067% faster in 1440p
  • RX 580 Mobile is 329% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 580 Mobile is 3700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 580 Mobile surpassed GT 710 in all 48 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.75 1.40
Recency 18 April 2017 27 March 2014
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 19 Watt

RX 580 Mobile has a 1096.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GT 710, on the other hand, has 426.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 580 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 580 Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce GT 710 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 580 Mobile
Radeon RX 580
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GeForce GT 710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 29 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 4436 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 580 Mobile or GeForce GT 710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.