Radeon RX 5600M vs RX 580 2048SP
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 580 2048SP with Radeon RX 5600M, including specs and performance data.
RX 5600M outperforms RX 580 2048SP by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 289 | 255 |
Place by popularity | 50 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 9.11 | 10.48 |
Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) |
GPU code name | Polaris 20 | Navi 10 |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 October 2018 (6 years ago) | 7 July 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 2304 |
Core clock speed | 1168 MHz | 1035 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1284 MHz | 1265 MHz |
Number of transistors | 5,700 million | 10,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 164.4 | 182.2 |
Floating-point processing power | 5.259 TFLOPS | 5.829 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 32 | 64 |
TMUs | 128 | 144 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
- Passmark
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 75−80
−18.7%
| 89
+18.7%
|
1440p | 50−55
−24%
| 62
+24%
|
4K | 30−35
−26.7%
| 38
+26.7%
|
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - Full HD
Epic Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Epic Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset - 4K
Epic Preset
Atomic Heart | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Atomic Heart | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 114
+0%
|
114
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Fortnite | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 48
+0%
|
48
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Valorant | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
Atomic Heart | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 112
+0%
|
112
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 240−250
+0%
|
240−250
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 107
+0%
|
107
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Fortnite | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 69
+0%
|
69
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 59
+0%
|
59
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 104
+0%
|
104
+0%
|
Valorant | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 106
+0%
|
106
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 104
+0%
|
104
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 80
+0%
|
80
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 40
+0%
|
40
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 64
+0%
|
64
+0%
|
Valorant | 115
+0%
|
115
+0%
|
Fortnite | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
Valorant | 190−200
+0%
|
190−200
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 82
+0%
|
82
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 45
+0%
|
45
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Fortnite | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Atomic Heart | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Valorant | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 41
+0%
|
41
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 22
+0%
|
22
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Fortnite | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
This is how RX 580 2048SP and RX 5600M compete in popular games:
- RX 5600M is 19% faster in 1080p
- RX 5600M is 24% faster in 1440p
- RX 5600M is 27% faster in 4K
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 17.13 | 19.72 |
Recency | 15 October 2018 | 7 July 2020 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
RX 580 2048SP has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.
RX 5600M, on the other hand, has a 15.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 580 2048SP in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon RX 580 2048SP is a desktop card while Radeon RX 5600M is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.