Radeon RX 5700 XT vs RX 560X Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 560X Mobile with Radeon RX 5700 XT, including specs and performance data.

RX 560X Mobile
2018
4 GB GDDR5, 65 Watt
11.05

RX 5700 XT outperforms RX 560X Mobile by a whopping 289% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking41987
Place by popularitynot in top-10072
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.73
Power efficiency11.7713.21
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 21Navi 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 April 2018 (6 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242560
Core clock speed1275 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speed1202 MHz1905 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate81.60304.8
Floating-point processing power2.611 TFLOPS9.754 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs64160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1450 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth92.8 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
VR Readyno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.131+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 560X Mobile 11.05
RX 5700 XT 42.93
+289%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 560X Mobile 8212
RX 5700 XT 35823
+336%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 560X Mobile 19829
RX 5700 XT 83961
+323%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 560X Mobile 6329
RX 5700 XT 26189
+314%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 560X Mobile 35511
RX 5700 XT 146093
+311%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 560X Mobile 189597
RX 5700 XT 499658
+164%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD34
−271%
126
+271%
1440p18−20
−328%
77
+328%
4K12−14
−308%
49
+308%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.17
1440pno data5.18
4Kno data8.14

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 23
−239%
78
+239%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
−204%
76
+204%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30
−267%
110
+267%
Battlefield 5 49
−306%
199
+306%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−436%
118
+436%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
−359%
78
+359%
Far Cry 5 35
−257%
125
+257%
Far Cry New Dawn 42
−181%
118
+181%
Forza Horizon 4 109
−173%
298
+173%
Hitman 3 24
−250%
84
+250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−422%
313
+422%
Metro Exodus 45
−220%
144
+220%
Red Dead Redemption 2 47
−145%
115
+145%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 56
−188%
160−170
+188%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−287%
259
+287%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 49
−214%
154
+214%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
−333%
91
+333%
Battlefield 5 36
−358%
165
+358%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−386%
107
+386%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
−400%
75
+400%
Far Cry 5 29
−248%
101
+248%
Far Cry New Dawn 28
−286%
108
+286%
Forza Horizon 4 105
−170%
283
+170%
Hitman 3 23
−274%
86
+274%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−390%
294
+390%
Metro Exodus 36
−300%
144
+300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−213%
97
+213%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 42
−360%
193
+360%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−207%
85−90
+207%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−270%
248
+270%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16
−288%
62
+288%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−359%
78
+359%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−264%
80
+264%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
−415%
67
+415%
Far Cry 5 21
−248%
73
+248%
Forza Horizon 4 38
−289%
148
+289%
Hitman 3 21
−295%
83
+295%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−125%
135
+125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 37
−362%
171
+362%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
−323%
93
+323%
Watch Dogs: Legion 11
−509%
67
+509%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30
−260%
108
+260%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−473%
126
+473%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−394%
84
+394%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−382%
53
+382%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−743%
59
+743%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−427%
58
+427%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−700%
40
+700%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−354%
59
+354%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−425%
273
+425%
Hitman 3 14−16
−321%
59
+321%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−352%
104
+352%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−512%
104
+512%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−644%
119
+644%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−491%
65−70
+491%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−244%
241
+244%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−339%
79
+339%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−460%
56
+460%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−450%
44
+450%
Hitman 3 7−8
−543%
45
+543%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−142%
121
+142%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−622%
65
+622%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−500%
54
+500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−483%
35
+483%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−560%
33
+560%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−560%
33
+560%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1600%
17
+1600%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−400%
30
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−464%
79
+464%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−788%
71
+788%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−225%
13
+225%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−300%
40
+300%

This is how RX 560X Mobile and RX 5700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT is 271% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5700 XT is 328% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5700 XT is 308% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5700 XT is 1600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 5700 XT surpassed RX 560X Mobile in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.05 42.93
Recency 11 April 2018 7 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 225 Watt

RX 560X Mobile has 246.2% lower power consumption.

RX 5700 XT, on the other hand, has a 288.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 560X Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 560X Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon RX 5700 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Radeon RX 560X Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 405 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7635 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.