Quadro T2000 Mobile vs Radeon RX 560X Mobile

Place in the ranking	427	269
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	11.48	23.83
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Polaris 21	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	11 April 2018 (6 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	1024
Core clock speed	1275 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	1202 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	81.60	114.2
Floating-point processing power	2.611 TFLOPS	3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	64	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1450 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	92.8 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 560X Mobile 10.84

T2000 Mobile 20.77
+91.6%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 560X Mobile 8212

T2000 Mobile 13524
+64.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−91.2%

65−70
+91.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	18 −106%	35−40 +106%
Cyberpunk 2077	23 −78.3%	40−45 +78.3%
Elden Ring	31 −113%	65−70 +113%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	35 −88.6%	65−70 +88.6%
Counter-Strike 2	15 −147%	35−40 +147%
Cyberpunk 2077	18 −128%	40−45 +128%
Forza Horizon 4	51 −72.5%	85−90 +72.5%
Metro Exodus	39 −43.6%	55−60 +43.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	47 +0%	45−50 +0%
Valorant	50 −68%	80−85 +68%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	44 −50%	65−70 +50%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 −85%	35−40 +85%
Cyberpunk 2077	15 −173%	40−45 +173%
Dota 2	47 −55.3%	70−75 +55.3%
Elden Ring	28 −136%	65−70 +136%
Far Cry 5	28 −143%	65−70 +143%
Fortnite	50 −118%	100−110 +118%
Forza Horizon 4	42 −110%	85−90 +110%
Grand Theft Auto V	36 −103%	70−75 +103%
Metro Exodus	26 −115%	55−60 +115%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	101 −36.6%	130−140 +36.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −67.9%	45−50 +67.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −100%	65−70 +100%
Valorant	40−45 −105%	80−85 +105%
World of Tanks	122 −93.4%	230−240 +93.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	31 −113%	65−70 +113%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 −85%	35−40 +85%
Cyberpunk 2077	7 −486%	40−45 +486%
Dota 2	66 −10.6%	70−75 +10.6%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −58.1%	65−70 +58.1%
Forza Horizon 4	37 −138%	85−90 +138%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	29 −376%	130−140 +376%
Valorant	40−45 −105%	80−85 +105%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −136%	30−35 +136%
Elden Ring	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −143%	30−35 +143%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −237%	170−180 +237%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −111%	18−20 +111%
World of Tanks	75−80 −79.5%	140−150 +79.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −100%	40−45 +100%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −54.5%	16−18 +54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −113%	16−18 +113%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −138%	55−60 +138%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −125%	50−55 +125%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −124%	45−50 +124%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −123%	27−30 +123%
Valorant	27−30 −100%	50−55 +100%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
Dota 2	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Elden Ring	7−8 −114%	14−16 +114%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −150%	14−16 +150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −93.8%	60−65 +93.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −110%	21−24 +110%
Counter-Strike 2	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Dota 2	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −108%	27−30 +108%
Fortnite	12−14 −108%	24−27 +108%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −121%	30−35 +121%
Valorant	10−12 −127%	24−27 +127%

This is how RX 560X Mobile and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

T2000 Mobile is 91% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 486% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

T2000 Mobile is ahead in 62 tests (98%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.84	20.77
Recency	11 April 2018	27 May 2019
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	60 Watt

T2000 Mobile has a 91.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 8.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 560X Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 560X Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.