Quadro T2000 Mobile vs Radeon RX 560X Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 560X Mobile with Quadro T2000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 560X Mobile
2018
4 GB GDDR5, 65 Watt
10.79

T2000 Mobile outperforms RX 560X Mobile by an impressive 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking436277
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.3823.73
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code namePolaris 21TU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date11 April 2018 (6 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241024
Core clock speed1275 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speed1202 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate81.60114.2
Floating-point processing power2.611 TFLOPS3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs6464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1450 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth92.8 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 560X Mobile 10.79
T2000 Mobile 20.77
+92.5%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 560X Mobile 8212
T2000 Mobile 13524
+64.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD34
−91.2%
65−70
+91.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 41
−26.8%
50−55
+26.8%
Counter-Strike 2 18
−100%
35−40
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
−78.3%
40−45
+78.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 30
−73.3%
50−55
+73.3%
Battlefield 5 52
−55.8%
80−85
+55.8%
Counter-Strike 2 15
−140%
35−40
+140%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
−141%
40−45
+141%
Far Cry 5 39
−69.2%
65−70
+69.2%
Fortnite 66
−54.5%
100−110
+54.5%
Forza Horizon 4 52
−51.9%
75−80
+51.9%
Forza Horizon 5 35
−54.3%
50−55
+54.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50
−48%
70−75
+48%
Valorant 95−100
−52.6%
140−150
+52.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18
−189%
50−55
+189%
Battlefield 5 44
−84.1%
80−85
+84.1%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−100%
35−40
+100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 122
−91%
230−240
+91%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
−173%
40−45
+173%
Dota 2 71
−54.9%
110−120
+54.9%
Far Cry 5 36
−83.3%
65−70
+83.3%
Fortnite 44
−132%
100−110
+132%
Forza Horizon 4 49
−61.2%
75−80
+61.2%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−108%
50−55
+108%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
−103%
70−75
+103%
Metro Exodus 20
−110%
40−45
+110%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 42
−76.2%
70−75
+76.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
−52.8%
55−60
+52.8%
Valorant 95−100
−52.6%
140−150
+52.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 39
−108%
80−85
+108%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−100%
35−40
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
−215%
40−45
+215%
Dota 2 66
−66.7%
110−120
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 33
−100%
65−70
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 38
−108%
75−80
+108%
Forza Horizon 5 21
−157%
50−55
+157%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30
−147%
70−75
+147%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
−150%
55−60
+150%
Valorant 95−100
−52.6%
140−150
+52.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 33
−209%
100−110
+209%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
−81.8%
140−150
+81.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−127%
30−35
+127%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−127%
24−27
+127%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−244%
170−180
+244%
Valorant 110−120
−62.5%
180−190
+62.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−120%
55−60
+120%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−110%
40−45
+110%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−104%
45−50
+104%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−100%
30−35
+100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 8−9
−87.5%
14−16
+87.5%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−133%
27−30
+133%
Valorant 50−55
−109%
110−120
+109%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−123%
27−30
+123%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Dota 2 35−40
−81.1%
65−70
+81.1%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−100%
30−35
+100%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−100%
20−22
+100%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

This is how RX 560X Mobile and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T2000 Mobile is 91% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 244% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T2000 Mobile is ahead in 66 tests (99%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.79 20.77
Recency 11 April 2018 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 60 Watt

T2000 Mobile has a 92.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 8.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 560X Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 560X Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Radeon RX 560X
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 418 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 415 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 560X Mobile or Quadro T2000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.