Iris Plus Graphics vs Radeon RX 560X Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 560X Mobile with Iris Plus Graphics, including specs and performance data.

RX 560X Mobile
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 60 Watt
11.06
+135%

RX 560X Mobile outperforms Iris Plus Graphics by a whopping 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking419645
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 11Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 January 2017 (7 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024512
Core clock speed1172 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1275 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60-80 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate81.6032.00
Floating-point processing power2.611 gflops1.024 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed6000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth92.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
+150%
14−16
−150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 23
+156%
9−10
−156%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
+150%
10−11
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30
+150%
12−14
−150%
Battlefield 5 49
+172%
18−20
−172%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+143%
7−8
−143%
Far Cry 5 35
+150%
14−16
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 42
+163%
16−18
−163%
Forza Horizon 4 109
+142%
45−50
−142%
Hitman 3 24
+140%
10−11
−140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+150%
24−27
−150%
Metro Exodus 45
+150%
18−20
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 47
+161%
18−20
−161%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 56
+167%
21−24
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+148%
27−30
−148%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 49
+172%
18−20
−172%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+163%
8−9
−163%
Battlefield 5 36
+157%
14−16
−157%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+150%
6−7
−150%
Far Cry 5 29
+142%
12−14
−142%
Far Cry New Dawn 28
+180%
10−11
−180%
Forza Horizon 4 105
+163%
40−45
−163%
Hitman 3 23
+156%
9−10
−156%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+150%
24−27
−150%
Metro Exodus 36
+157%
14−16
−157%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 42
+163%
16−18
−163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+148%
27−30
−148%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16
+167%
6−7
−167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+160%
5−6
−160%
Far Cry 5 21
+163%
8−9
−163%
Forza Horizon 4 38
+138%
16−18
−138%
Hitman 3 21
+163%
8−9
−163%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+150%
24−27
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 37
+164%
14−16
−164%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+144%
9−10
−144%
Watch Dogs: Legion 11
+175%
4−5
−175%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30
+150%
12−14
−150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+148%
21−24
−148%
Hitman 3 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+159%
27−30
−159%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Hitman 3 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+138%
21−24
−138%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

This is how RX 560X Mobile and Iris Plus Graphics compete in popular games:

  • RX 560X Mobile is 150% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.06 4.70
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 15 Watt

RX 560X Mobile has a 135.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Plus Graphics, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 560X Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 560X Mobile is a notebook card while Iris Plus Graphics is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Intel Iris Plus Graphics
Iris Plus Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 402 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 345 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.