Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP vs RX 5600 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking142not rated
Place by popularity79not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation55.49no data
Power efficiency16.40no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNavi 10Kalindi
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 January 2020 (4 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304128
Core clock speed1130 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate224.63.200
Floating-point processing power7.188 TFLOPS0.1024 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed14000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 January 2020 1 November 2013
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 15 Watt

RX 5600 XT has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

HD 8240 Mobile IGP, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5600 XT and Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5600 XT is a desktop card while Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Radeon RX 5600 XT
AMD Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP
Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2793 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.