Quadro M2000 vs Radeon RX 560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 560 with Quadro M2000, including specs and performance data.

RX 560
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
9.47

M2000 outperforms RX 560 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking468441
Place by popularity91not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.483.63
Power efficiency8.669.45
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code namePolaris 21GM206
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)8 April 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99 $437.75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro M2000 has 145% better value for money than RX 560.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024768
Core clock speed1175 MHz796 MHz
Boost clock speed1275 MHz1163 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate81.6055.82
Floating-point processing power2.611 TFLOPS1.786 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs6448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length170 mm201 mm
Width2-slot1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1653 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sUp to 106 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 560 9.47
Quadro M2000 10.34
+9.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 560 3649
Quadro M2000 3985
+9.2%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

RX 560 17125
+17.6%
Quadro M2000 14562

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

RX 560 18272
+27.9%
Quadro M2000 14286

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
+0%
35−40
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.8312.51

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.47 10.34
Recency 18 April 2017 8 April 2016
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

RX 560 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro M2000, on the other hand, has a 9.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 560 and Quadro M2000.

Be aware that Radeon RX 560 is a desktop card while Quadro M2000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 560
Radeon RX 560
NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Quadro M2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 2849 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 210 votes

Rate Quadro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.