Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs RX 5500 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking235not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation48.25no data
Power efficiency12.50no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 14Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 December 2019 (5 years ago)7 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 $699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14084096
Core clock speed1607 MHz1408 MHz
Boost clock speed1845 MHz1668 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt345 Watt
Texture fill rate162.4427.0
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPS13.66 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs88256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length180 mm282 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s483.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 December 2019 7 August 2017
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 345 Watt

RX 5500 XT has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 165.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5500 XT and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
Radeon RX 5500 XT
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2916 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 24 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.