Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs RX 5500 XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5500 XT with Radeon PRO WX 2100, including specs and performance data.

RX 5500 XT
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
23.68
+397%

RX 5500 XT outperforms PRO WX 2100 by a whopping 397% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking231636
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation49.084.22
Power efficiency13.019.71
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 14Lexa
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 December 2019 (4 years ago)4 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 $149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5500 XT has 1063% better value for money than PRO WX 2100.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408512
Core clock speed1607 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speed1845 MHz1219 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate162.439.01
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPS1.248 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Length180 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s48 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5500 XT 23.68
+397%
PRO WX 2100 4.76

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5500 XT 9137
+398%
PRO WX 2100 1835

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD78
+457%
14−16
−457%
1440p42
+425%
8−9
−425%
4K24
+500%
4−5
−500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 78
+875%
8−9
−875%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+300%
12−14
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 72
+1340%
5−6
−1340%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+550%
12−14
−550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+380%
10−11
−380%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+663%
8−9
−663%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+450%
10−11
−450%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+377%
12−14
−377%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+367%
30−33
−367%
Hitman 3 64
+540%
10−11
−540%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+255%
30−35
−255%
Metro Exodus 132
+1100%
10−12
−1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 108
+731%
12−14
−731%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+371%
16−18
−371%
Watch Dogs: Legion 202
+349%
45−50
−349%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 66
+408%
12−14
−408%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 58
+1060%
5−6
−1060%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+550%
12−14
−550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+380%
10−11
−380%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+463%
8−9
−463%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+450%
10−11
−450%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+377%
12−14
−377%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+367%
30−33
−367%
Hitman 3 62
+520%
10−11
−520%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+255%
30−35
−255%
Metro Exodus 94
+755%
10−12
−755%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+377%
12−14
−377%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 108
+535%
16−18
−535%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+206%
16−18
−206%
Watch Dogs: Legion 202
+349%
45−50
−349%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+300%
12−14
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 49
+880%
5−6
−880%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+380%
10−11
−380%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+400%
8−9
−400%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+450%
10−11
−450%
Forza Horizon 4 56
+86.7%
30−33
−86.7%
Hitman 3 55
+450%
10−11
−450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 87
+181%
30−35
−181%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95
+459%
16−18
−459%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
+241%
16−18
−241%
Watch Dogs: Legion 36
−25%
45−50
+25%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 76
+485%
12−14
−485%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+414%
7−8
−414%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+525%
4−5
−525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 37
+429%
7−8
−429%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
+900%
2−3
−900%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+1400%
9−10
−1400%
Hitman 3 36
+300%
9−10
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65
+491%
10−12
−491%
Metro Exodus 60
+2900%
2−3
−2900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 66
+450%
12−14
−450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+625%
4−5
−625%
Watch Dogs: Legion 184
+513%
30−33
−513%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 49
+444%
9−10
−444%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Hitman 3 26
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+2340%
5−6
−2340%
Metro Exodus 37
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+3000%
1−2
−3000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19
+850%
2−3
−850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Cyberpunk 2077 8 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Forza Horizon 4 21
+425%
4−5
−425%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 38
+443%
7−8
−443%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14
+1300%
1−2
−1300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24
+380%
5−6
−380%

This is how RX 5500 XT and PRO WX 2100 compete in popular games:

  • RX 5500 XT is 457% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5500 XT is 425% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5500 XT is 500% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 5500 XT is 3600% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the PRO WX 2100 is 25% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5500 XT is ahead in 67 tests (99%)
  • PRO WX 2100 is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.68 4.76
Recency 12 December 2019 4 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 35 Watt

RX 5500 XT has a 397.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

PRO WX 2100, on the other hand, has 271.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 5500 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5500 XT is a desktop card while Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
Radeon RX 5500 XT
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2816 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 37 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.