Quadro K2000 vs Radeon RX 550 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 550 Mobile with Quadro K2000, including specs and performance data.

RX 550 Mobile
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
6.96
+70.2%

RX 550 Mobile outperforms K2000 by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking549685
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.470.36
Power efficiency10.045.79
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameLexaGK107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2 July 2017 (7 years ago)1 March 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79.99 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 550 Mobile has 1142% better value for money than Quadro K2000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640384
Core clock speed1100 MHz954 MHz
Boost clock speed1287 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt51 Watt
Texture fill rate51.4830.53
Floating-point processing power1.647 TFLOPS0.7327 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data202 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10
+100%
5−6
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8
+100%
4−5
−100%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
Hitman 3 12
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8
+100%
4−5
−100%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
Hitman 3 12
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
Hitman 3 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4
+100%
2−3
−100%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Hitman 3 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Hitman 3 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

This is how RX 550 Mobile and Quadro K2000 compete in popular games:

  • RX 550 Mobile is 78% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.96 4.09
Recency 2 July 2017 1 March 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 51 Watt

RX 550 Mobile has a 70.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 2% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 550 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 550 Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro K2000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 550 Mobile
Radeon RX 550 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro K2000
Quadro K2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 34 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 212 votes

Rate Quadro K2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.