GeForce 930M vs Radeon RX 550 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 550 Mobile and GeForce 930M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 550 Mobile
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
6.97
+165%

RX 550 Mobile outperforms 930M by a whopping 165% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking555815
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.47no data
Power efficiency9.565.46
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameLexaGM108
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 July 2017 (7 years ago)13 March 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640384
Core clock speed1100 MHz549 MHz
Boost clock speed1287 MHz549 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt33 Watt
Texture fill rate51.4813.18
Floating-point processing power1.647 TFLOPS0.4216 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs4024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
GPU Boostno data2.0
Optimus-+
GameWorks-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.46.7 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 550 Mobile 6.97
+165%
GeForce 930M 2.63

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 550 Mobile 4559
+112%
GeForce 930M 2153

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 550 Mobile 3645
+150%
GeForce 930M 1461

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 550 Mobile 23050
+177%
GeForce 930M 8309

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
−12.5%
18
+12.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10
+100%
5−6
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8 0−1
Battlefield 5 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+254%
12−14
−254%
Hitman 3 12
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+46.2%
13
−46.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+109%
10−12
−109%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+39.5%
35−40
−39.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8 0−1
Battlefield 5 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+254%
12−14
−254%
Hitman 3 12
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24
+118%
10−12
−118%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−14.3%
24
+14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+39.5%
35−40
−39.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+254%
12−14
−254%
Hitman 3 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+243%
7
−243%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4
−850%
35−40
+850%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Hitman 3 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+193%
14−16
−193%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Hitman 3 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

This is how RX 550 Mobile and GeForce 930M compete in popular games:

  • GeForce 930M is 13% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 550 Mobile is 900% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce 930M is 850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 550 Mobile is ahead in 55 tests (96%)
  • GeForce 930M is ahead in 2 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.97 2.63
Recency 2 July 2017 13 March 2015
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 33 Watt

RX 550 Mobile has a 165% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 930M, on the other hand, has 51.5% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 550 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 930M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 550 Mobile
Radeon RX 550 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce 930M
GeForce 930M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 35 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 265 votes

Rate GeForce 930M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.