Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs RX 540

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 540 with Radeon Pro WX 3200, including specs and performance data.

RX 540
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
7.24
+15.5%

RX 540 outperforms Pro WX 3200 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking542578
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data12.43
Power efficiency9.926.61
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameLexaPolaris 23
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 November 2017 (7 years ago)2 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512640
Core clock speed1124 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate39.0134.62
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPS1.385 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 540 7.24
+15.5%
Pro WX 3200 6.27

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 540 2788
+15.5%
Pro WX 3200 2414

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 540 4646
+7.1%
Pro WX 3200 4338

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 540 13720
+9.4%
Pro WX 3200 12538

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 540 3686
+16.8%
Pro WX 3200 3156

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 540 24170
+28.1%
Pro WX 3200 18866

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 540 138197
+30.6%
Pro WX 3200 105833

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 540 787
Pro WX 3200 956
+21.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
+15%
20
−15%
4K9−10
+12.5%
8
−12.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data9.95
4Kno data24.88

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 13
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+17.1%
40−45
−17.1%
Hitman 3 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+10.5%
35−40
−10.5%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−14.3%
24
+14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40
+81.8%
21−24
−81.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+5.9%
50−55
−5.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 10
−40%
14−16
+40%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+17.1%
40−45
−17.1%
Hitman 3 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+10.5%
35−40
−10.5%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+50%
14
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+9.1%
21−24
−9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+10%
20−22
−10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+5.9%
50−55
−5.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 7
−100%
14−16
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+17.1%
40−45
−17.1%
Hitman 3 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+10.5%
35−40
−10.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+9.1%
21−24
−9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−42.9%
10
+42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+5.9%
50−55
−5.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+30%
20−22
−30%
Hitman 3 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+15%
40−45
−15%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Hitman 3 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+35.3%
16−18
−35.3%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−25%
5
+25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how RX 540 and Pro WX 3200 compete in popular games:

  • RX 540 is 15% faster in 1080p
  • RX 540 is 13% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 540 is 200% faster.
  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro WX 3200 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 540 is ahead in 59 tests (83%)
  • Pro WX 3200 is ahead in 6 tests (8%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.24 6.27
Recency 11 November 2017 2 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 65 Watt

RX 540 has a 15.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 30% lower power consumption.

Pro WX 3200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon RX 540 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 540 is a notebook card while Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 540
Radeon RX 540
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 157 votes

Rate Radeon RX 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 84 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.