GeForce GT 425M vs Radeon RX 540

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 540 and GeForce GT 425M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 540
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
7.23
+436%

RX 540 outperforms GT 425M by a whopping 436% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5391017
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.014.06
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameLexaGF108
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 November 2017 (7 years ago)3 September 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51296
Core clock speed1124 MHz560 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate39.018.960
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPS0.215 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs3216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 API
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 540 7.23
+436%
GT 425M 1.35

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 540 2788
+434%
GT 425M 522

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 540 4646
+517%
GT 425M 753

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 540 13720
+306%
GT 425M 3381

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

RX 540 9416
+402%
GT 425M 1875

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p55−60
+400%
11
−400%
Full HD23
+35.3%
17
−35.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Far Cry 5 13
+550%
2−3
−550%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+1500%
3−4
−1500%
Hitman 3 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+200%
14−16
−200%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40
+400%
8−9
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+63.6%
30−35
−63.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Far Cry 5 10
+400%
2−3
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+1500%
3−4
−1500%
Hitman 3 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+200%
14−16
−200%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+100%
10−12
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+63.6%
30−35
−63.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Far Cry 5 7
+250%
2−3
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+1500%
3−4
−1500%
Hitman 3 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+200%
14−16
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+63.6%
30−35
−63.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+550%
4−5
−550%
Hitman 3 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+667%
6−7
−667%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Hitman 3 3−4 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+475%
4−5
−475%
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

This is how RX 540 and GT 425M compete in popular games:

  • RX 540 is 400% faster in 900p
  • RX 540 is 35% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 540 is 1500% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GT 425M is 57% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 540 is ahead in 48 tests (98%)
  • GT 425M is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.23 1.35
Recency 11 November 2017 3 September 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 23 Watt

RX 540 has a 435.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

GT 425M, on the other hand, has 117.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 540 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 425M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 540
Radeon RX 540
NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
GeForce GT 425M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 157 votes

Rate Radeon RX 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 55 votes

Rate GeForce GT 425M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.