Radeon R7 350 640SP vs RX 5300

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking279not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.71no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 14Cape Verde
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 May 2020 (4 years ago)7 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408640
Core clock speed1327 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate144.837.00
Floating-point processing power4.632 TFLOPS1.184 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8840

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length180 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB2 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.0 GB/s72 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 May 2020 7 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 55 Watt

RX 5300 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

R7 350 640SP, on the other hand, has 81.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5300 and Radeon R7 350 640SP. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5300
Radeon RX 5300
AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP
Radeon R7 350 640SP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 33 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R7 350 640SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.