FirePro D500 vs Radeon RX 5300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5300 with FirePro D500, including specs and performance data.


RX 5300
2020
3 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
18.19
+84.1%

RX 5300 outperforms D500 by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking338490
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.012.78
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 14Tahiti
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 May 2020 (5 years ago)18 January 2014 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14081536
Core clock speed1327 MHz725 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt274 Watt
Texture fill rate144.869.60
Floating-point processing power4.632 TFLOPS2.227 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8896
L1 Cacheno data384 KB
L2 Cache1536 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length180 mm279 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB3 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1270 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.0 GB/s243.8 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.19 9.88
Recency 28 May 2020 18 January 2014
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 274 Watt

RX 5300 has a 84% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 174% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 5300 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro D500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5300 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro D500 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 47 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 22 votes

Rate FirePro D500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5300 or FirePro D500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.