ATI Radeon 9000 vs RX 470 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking299not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.65no data
Power efficiency14.80no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameEllesmereRV250
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 August 2016 (8 years ago)1 July 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed926 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1074 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate137.51.000
Floating-point processing power4.399 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs1284

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)8.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2016 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 28 Watt

RX 470 Mobile has an age advantage of 14 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9000, on the other hand, has 203.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 470 Mobile and Radeon 9000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 470 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon 9000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile
Radeon RX 470 Mobile
ATI Radeon 9000
Radeon 9000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 32 votes

Rate Radeon RX 470 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 30 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.