Quadro M2000 vs Radeon RX 470 Mobile

Place in the ranking	299	440
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	9.69	3.44
Power efficiency	14.90	9.59
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code name	Ellesmere	GM206
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	4 August 2016 (8 years ago)	8 April 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$549.99	$437.75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 470 Mobile has 182% better value for money than Quadro M2000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	768
Core clock speed	926 MHz	796 MHz
Boost clock speed	1074 MHz	1163 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	137.5	55.82
Floating-point processing power	4.399 TFLOPS	1.786 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	201 mm
Width	no data	1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	1653 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	Up to 106 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displays	no data	4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
3D Vision Pro	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
nView Desktop Management	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA	-	5.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−33
+87.5%

16−18

−87.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +100%	21−24 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +77.8%	18−20 −77.8%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +77.1%	35−40 −77.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +81%	21−24 −81%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +87.5%	16−18 −87.5%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +83.3%	24−27 −83.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +88.9%	27−30 −88.9%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +81.5%	65−70 −81.5%
Hitman 3	35−40 +76.2%	21−24 −76.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +84%	50−55 −84%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +85.7%	35−40 −85.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +88.9%	27−30 −88.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 +77.1%	35−40 −77.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +78%	50−55 −78%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +100%	21−24 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +77.8%	18−20 −77.8%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +77.1%	35−40 −77.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +81%	21−24 −81%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +87.5%	16−18 −87.5%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +83.3%	24−27 −83.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +88.9%	27−30 −88.9%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +81.5%	65−70 −81.5%
Hitman 3	35−40 +76.2%	21−24 −76.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +84%	50−55 −84%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +85.7%	35−40 −85.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +88.9%	27−30 −88.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 +77.1%	35−40 −77.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +79.2%	24−27 −79.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +78%	50−55 −78%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +100%	21−24 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +77.8%	18−20 −77.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +81%	21−24 −81%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +87.5%	16−18 −87.5%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +83.3%	24−27 −83.3%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +81.5%	65−70 −81.5%
Hitman 3	35−40 +76.2%	21−24 −76.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +84%	50−55 −84%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 +77.1%	35−40 −77.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +79.2%	24−27 −79.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +78%	50−55 −78%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55
+88.9%

27−30

−88.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +100%	18−20 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +81.3%	16−18 −81.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +90%	10−11 −90%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +110%	10−11 −110%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +89.1%	55−60 −89.1%
Hitman 3	21−24 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +81%	21−24 −81%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +94.4%	18−20 −94.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +81%	21−24 −81%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +110%	10−11 −110%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +88.3%	60−65 −88.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35
+93.8%

16−18

−93.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +90%	10−11 −90%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Hitman 3	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +76.4%	55−60 −76.4%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +100%	10−11 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +90%	10−11 −90%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +85.7%	14−16 −85.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +110%	10−11 −110%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

+88.9%

9−10
−88.9%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	18.17	10.32
Recency	4 August 2016	8 April 2016
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	75 Watt

RX 470 Mobile has a 76.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro M2000, on the other hand, has 13.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 470 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 470 Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro M2000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.