GeForce 7600 GT vs Radeon RX 470 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 470 Mobile with GeForce 7600 GT, including specs and performance data.
RX 470 Mobile outperforms 7600 GT by a whopping 3005% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 313 | 1217 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 10.13 | 0.01 |
| Power efficiency | 14.80 | 1.01 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Curie (2003−2013) |
| GPU code name | Ellesmere | G73 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 4 August 2016 (8 years ago) | 9 March 2006 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549.99 | $199 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
RX 470 Mobile has 101200% better value for money than 7600 GT.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 926 MHz | 560 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1074 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 5,700 million | 177 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 137.5 | 6.720 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.399 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 32 | 8 |
| TMUs | 128 | 12 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 22.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 9.0c (9_3) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+3100%
|
1−2
−3100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+3500%
|
1−2
−3500%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+5700%
|
1−2
−5700%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+3100%
|
1−2
−3100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+3500%
|
1−2
−3500%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+3700%
|
2−3
−3700%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+4800%
|
1−2
−4800%
|
| Metro Exodus | 50−55
+4900%
|
1−2
−4900%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 40−45
+4200%
|
1−2
−4200%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
+3600%
|
2−3
−3600%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+5700%
|
1−2
−5700%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+3100%
|
1−2
−3100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+3500%
|
1−2
−3500%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+3150%
|
2−3
−3150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65
+6100%
|
1−2
−6100%
|
| Fortnite | 95−100
+3167%
|
3−4
−3167%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+3700%
|
2−3
−3700%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+4800%
|
1−2
−4800%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 65−70
+3150%
|
2−3
−3150%
|
| Metro Exodus | 50−55
+4900%
|
1−2
−4900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 120−130
+3050%
|
4−5
−3050%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 40−45
+4200%
|
1−2
−4200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 55−60
+5600%
|
1−2
−5600%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
+3600%
|
2−3
−3600%
|
| World of Tanks | 220−230
+3043%
|
7−8
−3043%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+5700%
|
1−2
−5700%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+3100%
|
1−2
−3100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+3500%
|
1−2
−3500%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+3150%
|
2−3
−3150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65
+6100%
|
1−2
−6100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+3700%
|
2−3
−3700%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+4800%
|
1−2
−4800%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 120−130
+3050%
|
4−5
−3050%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
+3600%
|
2−3
−3600%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+3200%
|
5−6
−3200%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| World of Tanks | 120−130
+3025%
|
4−5
−3025%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+3600%
|
1−2
−3600%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
+4700%
|
1−2
−4700%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+4500%
|
1−2
−4500%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 40−45
+4000%
|
1−2
−4000%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 45−50
+4500%
|
1−2
−4500%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
+5300%
|
1−2
−5300%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 21−24 | 0−1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.70 | 0.57 |
| Recency | 4 August 2016 | 9 March 2006 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 40 Watt |
RX 470 Mobile has a 3005.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
7600 GT, on the other hand, has 112.5% lower power consumption.
The Radeon RX 470 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7600 GT in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon RX 470 Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce 7600 GT is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
