RTX PRO 6000 vs Radeon R9 Nano

#ad 
Buy
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking267not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.70no data
Power efficiency8.63no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameFijiGB202
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date27 August 2015 (9 years ago)2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409624064
Compute units64no data
Core clock speedno data2017 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2407 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate256.01,810
Floating-point processing power8.192 TFLOPS115.8 TFLOPS
ROPs64176
TMUs256752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length152 mm304 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 16-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)GDDR7
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB96 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 2.1b
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.4
Mantle+-
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 600 Watt

R9 Nano has 242.9% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000, on the other hand, has a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 Nano and RTX PRO 6000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 Nano is a desktop card while RTX PRO 6000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Radeon R9 Nano
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 91 vote

Rate Radeon R9 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 Nano or RTX PRO 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.