GeForce GTX 1660 vs Radeon R9 M485X

Place in the ranking	464	183
Place by popularity	not in top-100	52
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	48.64
Power efficiency	2.65	17.58
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Amethyst	TU116
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	15 May 2016 (8 years ago)	14 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$219

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	1408
Core clock speed	723 MHz	1530 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	92.54	157.1
Floating-point processing power	2.961 TFLOPS	5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	48
TMUs	128	88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	229 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	2001 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	192.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.3	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M485X 9.49

GTX 1660 30.26
+219%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M485X 3660

GTX 1660 11675
+219%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	24−27 −242%	82 +242%
1440p	14−16 −250%	49 +250%
4K	8−9 −238%	27 +238%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.67
1440p	no data	4.47
4K	no data	8.11

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−373%

71
+373%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −321%	59 +321%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −241%	95−100 +241%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −284%	73 +284%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −287%	58 +287%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −209%	65−70 +209%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −196%	75−80 +196%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −162%	160−170 +162%
Hitman 3	18−20 −283%	69 +283%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −477%	306 +477%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −380%	144 +380%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −331%	112 +331%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −239%	100−110 +239%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −272%	227 +272%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −435%	123 +435%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −200%	42 +200%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −241%	95−100 +241%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −253%	67 +253%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −213%	47 +213%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −209%	65−70 +209%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −196%	75−80 +196%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −162%	160−170 +162%
Hitman 3	18−20 −272%	67 +272%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −442%	287 +442%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −277%	113 +277%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −204%	79 +204%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −255%	110 +255%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −146%	60−65 +146%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −251%	214 +251%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −164%	37 +164%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −158%	49 +158%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −167%	40 +167%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −209%	65−70 +209%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −55.6%	98 +55.6%
Hitman 3	18−20 −228%	59 +228%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −75.5%	93 +75.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −206%	95 +206%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −119%	57 +119%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +110%	29 −110%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

−212%

81
+212%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −217%	55−60 +217%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −229%	45−50 +229%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −256%	30−35 +256%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −440%	27 +440%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −240%	34 +240%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −500%	24 +500%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −218%	35−40 +218%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −324%	170−180 +324%
Hitman 3	12−14 −200%	39 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −235%	67 +235%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −354%	59 +354%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −509%	67 +509%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −212%	187 +212%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

−231%

53
+231%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Hitman 3	6−7 −250%	21 +250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −61.5%	63 +61.5%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −529%	44 +529%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −400%	35 +400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −280%	18−20 +280%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −275%	15 +275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −325%	17 +325%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −900%	10 +900%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −317%	50 +317%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −500%	36 +500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −300%	12 +300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10

−189%

26
+189%

This is how R9 M485X and GTX 1660 compete in popular games:

GTX 1660 is 242% faster in 1080p
GTX 1660 is 250% faster in 1440p
GTX 1660 is 238% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M485X is 110% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1660 is 900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

R9 M485X is ahead in 1 test (1%)
GTX 1660 is ahead in 71 test (99%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.49	30.26
Recency	15 May 2016	14 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	120 Watt

R9 M485X has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1660, on the other hand, has a 218.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 108.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M485X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M485X is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 1660 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.