GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Radeon R9 M470

Place in the ranking	585	271
Place by popularity	not in top-100	62
Power efficiency	no data	27.74
Architecture	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Emerald	TU116
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 May 2016 (8 years ago)	23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	1024
Core clock speed	900 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	2,080 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	48.00	95.04
Floating-point processing power	1.536 TFLOPS	3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	48	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.3	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.140
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M470 6.05

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.23
+234%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M470 2330

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+235%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 M470 3655

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9930
+172%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R9 M470 24365

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 65163
+167%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	16−18 −263%	58 +263%
1440p	14−16 −236%	47 +236%
4K	6−7 −267%	22 +267%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−11

−490%

59
+490%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −281%	61 +281%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −600%	49 +600%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −288%	65−70 +288%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −308%	53 +308%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −360%	46 +360%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −431%	69 +431%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −394%	84 +394%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −218%	120−130 +218%
Hitman 3	12−14 −325%	51 +325%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −389%	181 +389%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −469%	91 +469%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −175%	44 +175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −219%	65−70 +219%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −302%	201 +302%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −181%	45−50 +181%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −357%	32 +357%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −288%	65−70 +288%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −262%	47 +262%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −260%	36 +260%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −346%	58 +346%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −247%	59 +247%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −218%	120−130 +218%
Hitman 3	12−14 −317%	50 +317%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −386%	180 +386%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −394%	79 +394%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −144%	39 +144%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −257%	75 +257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −125%	45−50 +125%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −266%	183 +266%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −68.8%	27 +68.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −114%	15 +114%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −138%	31 +138%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −240%	34 +240%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −200%	39 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −218%	120−130 +218%
Hitman 3	12−14 −258%	43 +258%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −73%	64 +73%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −200%	63 +200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −95%	39 +95%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +127%	22 −127%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

−156%

41
+156%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −255%	35−40 +255%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −322%	38 +322%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −267%	21−24 +267%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −433%	16 +433%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −271%	26 +271%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −528%	110−120 +528%
Hitman 3	10−11 −180%	28 +180%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −215%	40−45 +215%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −660%	35−40 +660%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −1950%	40−45 +1950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −360%	21−24 +360%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −216%	120 +216%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

−200%

30−35
+200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −300%	20−22 +300%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −400%	20 +400%
Hitman 3	2−3 −700%	16 +700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −180%	42 +180%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −633%	21−24 +633%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −1150%	25 +1150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −200%	12−14 +200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −450%	10−12 +450%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	6
Far Cry 5	3−4 −300%	12 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −367%	27−30 +367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	21−24
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−200%

18−20
+200%

This is how R9 M470 and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 263% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 236% faster in 1440p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 267% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M470 is 127% faster.
in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 1950% faster.

All in all, in popular games: