Radeon RX 6700 XT vs R9 M385

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M385 with Radeon RX 6700 XT, including specs and performance data.

R9 M385
2015
4 GB GDDR5
5.34

RX 6700 XT outperforms R9 M385 by a whopping 864% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking60750
Place by popularitynot in top-10072
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data58.18
Power efficiencyno data16.16
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameStratoNavi 22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)3 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8962560
Core clock speed900 MHz2321 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz2581 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data230 Watt
Texture fill rate56.00413.0
Floating-point processing power1.792 TFLOPS13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs56160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.1
Vulkan-1.2
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M385 5.34
RX 6700 XT 51.50
+864%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M385 2060
RX 6700 XT 19872
+865%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
−906%
161
+906%
1440p9−10
−911%
91
+911%
4K5−6
−920%
51
+920%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1222%
119
+1222%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−671%
100−110
+671%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−2717%
169
+2717%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−1071%
160−170
+1071%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1000%
99
+1000%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−758%
100−110
+758%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−733%
120−130
+733%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−532%
210−220
+532%
Hitman 3 10−12
−1155%
138
+1155%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−491%
200−210
+491%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−1031%
140−150
+1031%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−671%
100−110
+671%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−958%
200−210
+958%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−198%
140−150
+198%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−671%
100−110
+671%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−2300%
144
+2300%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−1071%
160−170
+1071%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−900%
90
+900%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−758%
100−110
+758%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−733%
120−130
+733%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−532%
210−220
+532%
Hitman 3 10−12
−1136%
136
+1136%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−491%
200−210
+491%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−1031%
140−150
+1031%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−671%
100−110
+671%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−1379%
281
+1379%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−494%
100−110
+494%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−198%
140−150
+198%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−671%
100−110
+671%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−1983%
125
+1983%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−844%
85
+844%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−758%
100−110
+758%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−532%
210−220
+532%
Hitman 3 10−12
−1127%
135
+1127%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−468%
193
+468%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−1163%
240
+1163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−606%
127
+606%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−75%
84
+75%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−671%
100−110
+671%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−960%
100−110
+960%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−900%
80−85
+900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1060%
55−60
+1060%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 109
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1120%
60−65
+1120%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2700%
56
+2700%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1908%
260−270
+1908%
Hitman 3 9−10
−822%
83
+822%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1108%
145
+1108%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−4000%
123
+4000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1975%
80−85
+1975%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−547%
220−230
+547%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−790%
85−90
+790%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−1075%
45−50
+1075%
Hitman 3 1−2
−4700%
48
+4700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−2000%
210−220
+2000%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−3500%
70−75
+3500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−7300%
74
+7300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1167%
35−40
+1167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−2300%
48
+2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 25
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1000%
30−35
+1000%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1420%
75−80
+1420%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−1650%
35
+1650%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−717%
45−50
+717%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 173
+0%
173
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 93
+0%
93
+0%

This is how R9 M385 and RX 6700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700 XT is 906% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6700 XT is 911% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6700 XT is 920% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6700 XT is 7300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6700 XT is ahead in 68 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.34 51.50
Recency 5 May 2015 3 March 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

RX 6700 XT has a 864.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M385 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M385 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6700 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M385
Radeon R9 M385
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon R9 M385 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 6468 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.