Radeon Pro 5600M vs R9 M290X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M290X with Radeon Pro 5600M, including specs and performance data.

R9 M290X
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
8.45

Pro 5600M outperforms R9 M290X by a whopping 184% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking500233
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.7932.85
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameNeptuneNavi 12
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date9 January 2014 (10 years ago)15 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802560
Compute units20no data
Core clock speed850 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1030 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate72.00164.8
Floating-point processing power2.304 TFLOPS5.274 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs80160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz770 MHz
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/s394.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.0
Vulkan-1.2
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M290X 8.45
Pro 5600M 23.96
+184%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M290X 3256
Pro 5600M 9232
+184%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46
−183%
130−140
+183%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−200%
35−40
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−148%
50−55
+148%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−242%
40−45
+242%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−200%
75−80
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−188%
45−50
+188%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−200%
35−40
+200%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−163%
60−65
+163%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−152%
140−150
+152%
Hitman 3 16−18
−200%
45−50
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−131%
110−120
+131%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−215%
80−85
+215%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−174%
60−65
+174%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−189%
80−85
+189%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−74.1%
100−110
+74.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−148%
50−55
+148%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−242%
40−45
+242%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−200%
75−80
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−188%
45−50
+188%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−200%
35−40
+200%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−163%
60−65
+163%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−152%
140−150
+152%
Hitman 3 16−18
−200%
45−50
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−131%
110−120
+131%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−215%
80−85
+215%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−174%
60−65
+174%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−189%
80−85
+189%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−117%
50−55
+117%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−74.1%
100−110
+74.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−148%
50−55
+148%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−242%
40−45
+242%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−188%
45−50
+188%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−200%
35−40
+200%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−152%
140−150
+152%
Hitman 3 16−18
−200%
45−50
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−131%
110−120
+131%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−189%
80−85
+189%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−117%
50−55
+117%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−74.1%
100−110
+74.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−174%
60−65
+174%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−177%
35−40
+177%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−213%
24−27
+213%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−275%
14−16
+275%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−180%
27−30
+180%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−300%
130−140
+300%
Hitman 3 12−14
−133%
27−30
+133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−172%
45−50
+172%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−478%
50−55
+478%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−263%
27−30
+263%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−152%
130−140
+152%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−217%
18−20
+217%
Hitman 3 5−6
−280%
18−20
+280%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−284%
120−130
+284%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−230%
30−35
+230%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−625%
27−30
+625%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%

This is how R9 M290X and Pro 5600M compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is 183% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 625% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro 5600M surpassed R9 M290X in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.45 23.96
Recency 9 January 2014 15 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 50 Watt

Pro 5600M has a 183.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M290X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M290X is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M290X
Radeon R9 M290X
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 12 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M290X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 77 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.