L40 CNX vs Radeon R9 M290X
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 494 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 5.84 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | Neptune | AD102 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 9 January 2014 (10 years ago) | 13 October 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 18176 |
| Compute units | 20 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | 2475 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2,800 million | 76,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 72.00 | 1,406 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.304 TFLOPS | 89.97 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 192 |
| TMUs | 80 | 568 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 568 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 142 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 864.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| Eyefinity | + | - |
| HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
| HD3D | + | - |
| PowerTune | + | - |
| DualGraphics | + | - |
| ZeroCore | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 11 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
| Mantle | + | - |
| CUDA | - | 8.9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 9 January 2014 | 13 October 2022 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 24 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 300 Watt |
R9 M290X has 200% lower power consumption.
L40 CNX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M290X and L40 CNX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R9 M290X is a notebook card while L40 CNX is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
