Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M290X

Place in the ranking	497	464
Place by popularity	not in top-100	75
Power efficiency	5.83	23.35
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Neptune	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	9 January 2014 (10 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	96
Compute units	20	no data
Core clock speed	850 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	900 MHz	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	2,800 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	72.00	no data
Floating-point processing power	2.304 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	80	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1200 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	153.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	no data
Eyefinity	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
HD3D	+	-
PowerTune	+	-
DualGraphics	+	-
ZeroCore	+	-
Switchable graphics	+	-
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 11	12_1
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.4	no data
OpenCL	Not Listed	no data
Mantle	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M290X 8.44

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 9.46
+12.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R9 M290X 6817
+4.6%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 6518

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R9 M290X 23961

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 25978
+8.4%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 M290X 5294
+2.9%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 5143

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R9 M290X 33147
+23%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 26949

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	44 +69.2%	26 −69.2%
1440p	14−16 −14.3%	16 +14.3%
4K	9−10 −22.2%	11 +22.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14

−53.8%

20
+53.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −4.8%	22 +4.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −75%	21 +75%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −11.5%	27−30 +11.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −112%	36 +112%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −23.1%	16 +23.1%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −15.8%	21−24 +15.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −8.3%	24−27 +8.3%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −12.5%	60−65 +12.5%
Hitman 3	16−18 −50%	24 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −158%	124 +158%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −34.6%	35 +34.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +35.3%	17 −35.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −10.7%	30−35 +10.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −55.2%	90 +55.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −9.5%	21−24 +9.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −50%	18 +50%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −11.5%	27−30 +11.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −88.2%	32 +88.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +0%	13 +0%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −15.8%	21−24 +15.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −8.3%	24−27 +8.3%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −12.5%	60−65 +12.5%
Hitman 3	16−18 −43.8%	23 +43.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −133%	112 +133%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −7.7%	28 +7.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −13%	26 +13%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −7.1%	30 +7.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −8.3%	24−27 +8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −44.8%	84 +44.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +50%	14 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −35.3%	23 +35.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +18.2%	11 −18.2%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −15.8%	21−24 +15.8%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −12.5%	60−65 +12.5%
Hitman 3	16−18 −25%	20 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +109%	23 −109%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +16.7%	24 −16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +71.4%	14 −71.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −5.2%	60−65 +5.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
+64.3%

−64.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −75%	7 +75%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −20.6%	40−45 +20.6%
Hitman 3	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −11.1%	20−22 +11.1%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −18.2%	12−14 +18.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −111%	19 +111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −11.1%	60−65 +11.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−14.3%

16−18
+14.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Hitman 3	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −21.9%	35−40 +21.9%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −140%	12 +140%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −175%	11 +175%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

−12.5%

9−10
+12.5%

This is how R9 M290X and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compete in popular games:

R9 M290X is 69% faster in 1080p
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 14% faster in 1440p
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 22% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M290X is 109% faster.
in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 175% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

R9 M290X is ahead in 7 tests (10%)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is ahead in 58 tests (81%)
there's a draw in 7 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.44	9.46
Recency	9 January 2014	15 August 2020
Chip lithography	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	28 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs has a 12.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 257.1% lower power consumption.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M290X in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.