ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View vs Radeon R9 M290X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking569not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.98no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNeptuneRV620
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date9 January 2014 (12 years ago)2009 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128040
Compute units20no data
Core clock speed850 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,800 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate72.001.600
Floating-point processing power2.304 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs804
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x VHDCI
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1110.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)4.1
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCLNot ListedN/A
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 32 Watt

R9 M290X has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 2450 Multi-View, on the other hand, has 213% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M290X and FirePro 2450 Multi-View. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M290X is a notebook graphics card while FirePro 2450 Multi-View is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 13 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M290X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro 2450 Multi-View on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M290X or FirePro 2450 Multi-View, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.