Radeon Pro V340 vs R9 M290X Crossfire

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire with Radeon Pro V340, including specs and performance data.

R9 M290X Crossfire
2014
2x 4 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
18.98
+157%

R9 M290X Crossfire outperforms Pro V340 by a whopping 157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking289527
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.852.32
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNeptune CFVega 10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2014 (10 years ago)26 August 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25603584
Core clock speed850 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2800 Million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rateno data336.0
Floating-point processing powerno data10.75 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data483.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.1.125

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD61
+190%
21−24
−190%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+175%
16−18
−175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+175%
12−14
−175%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+171%
24−27
−171%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+186%
14−16
−186%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+194%
18−20
−194%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+171%
45−50
−171%
Hitman 3 35−40
+179%
14−16
−179%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+171%
35−40
−171%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+183%
24−27
−183%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+194%
18−20
−194%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+171%
24−27
−171%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+160%
35−40
−160%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+175%
16−18
−175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+175%
12−14
−175%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+171%
24−27
−171%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+186%
14−16
−186%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+194%
18−20
−194%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+171%
45−50
−171%
Hitman 3 35−40
+179%
14−16
−179%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+171%
35−40
−171%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+183%
24−27
−183%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+194%
18−20
−194%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+171%
24−27
−171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+175%
16−18
−175%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+160%
35−40
−160%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+175%
16−18
−175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+175%
12−14
−175%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+186%
14−16
−186%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+171%
45−50
−171%
Hitman 3 35−40
+179%
14−16
−179%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+171%
35−40
−171%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+171%
24−27
−171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+175%
16−18
−175%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+160%
35−40
−160%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+194%
18−20
−194%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+175%
40−45
−175%
Hitman 3 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+186%
14−16
−186%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+164%
14−16
−164%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+186%
14−16
−186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+160%
45−50
−160%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+175%
12−14
−175%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Hitman 3 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+191%
35−40
−191%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%

This is how R9 M290X Crossfire and Pro V340 compete in popular games:

  • R9 M290X Crossfire is 190% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.98 7.39
Recency 1 March 2014 26 August 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 230 Watt

R9 M290X Crossfire has a 156.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 15% lower power consumption.

Pro V340, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro V340 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is a notebook card while Radeon Pro V340 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
AMD Radeon Pro V340
Radeon Pro V340

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 11 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.