GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R9 Fury

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 Fury and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 Fury
2015
4 GB High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), 275 Watt
24.87

RTX 4060 Ti outperforms R9 Fury by a whopping 139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking21533
Place by popularitynot in top-10014
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.1783.24
Power efficiency6.3125.91
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameFijiAD106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 July 2015 (9 years ago)18 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4060 Ti has 919% better value for money than R9 Fury.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35844352
Compute units56no data
Core clock speedno data2310 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2535 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate224.0344.8
Floating-point processing power7.168 TFLOPS22.06 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs224136
Tensor Coresno data136
Ray Tracing Coresno data34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data240 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors​2x 8-pin1x 16-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)GDDR6
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI++
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.3
Mantle+-
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 Fury 24.87
RTX 4060 Ti 59.44
+139%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 Fury 9593
RTX 4060 Ti 22929
+139%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90
−133%
210−220
+133%
1440p87
−130%
200−210
+130%
4K48
−129%
110−120
+129%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.101.90
1440p6.312.00
4K11.443.63

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−138%
95−100
+138%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−122%
120−130
+122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−138%
100−105
+138%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−135%
190−200
+135%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−135%
120−130
+135%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−138%
95−100
+138%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−128%
130−140
+128%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−131%
150−160
+131%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−107%
300−310
+107%
Hitman 3 50−55
−120%
110−120
+120%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−135%
270−280
+135%
Metro Exodus 85−90
−135%
200−210
+135%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−131%
150−160
+131%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−138%
200−210
+138%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−133%
240−250
+133%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−122%
120−130
+122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−138%
100−105
+138%
Battlefield 5 51
−135%
120−130
+135%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−135%
120−130
+135%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−138%
95−100
+138%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−128%
130−140
+128%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−131%
150−160
+131%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−107%
300−310
+107%
Hitman 3 50−55
−120%
110−120
+120%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−135%
270−280
+135%
Metro Exodus 85−90
−135%
200−210
+135%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−131%
150−160
+131%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−138%
200−210
+138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−122%
120−130
+122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−133%
240−250
+133%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 29
−124%
65−70
+124%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−138%
100−105
+138%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−135%
120−130
+135%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−138%
95−100
+138%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−128%
130−140
+128%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−107%
300−310
+107%
Hitman 3 50−55
−120%
110−120
+120%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−135%
270−280
+135%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−138%
200−210
+138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
−117%
100−105
+117%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−133%
240−250
+133%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−131%
150−160
+131%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−134%
110−120
+134%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−137%
90−95
+137%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−131%
60−65
+131%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−129%
55−60
+129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−124%
65−70
+124%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−111%
300−310
+111%
Hitman 3 30−33
−133%
70−75
+133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−135%
120−130
+135%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−134%
110−120
+134%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−122%
120−130
+122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−126%
70−75
+126%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−114%
300−310
+114%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−138%
100−105
+138%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 38
−137%
90−95
+137%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Hitman 3 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−134%
300−310
+134%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
−136%
85−90
+136%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 11
−118%
24−27
+118%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−135%
80−85
+135%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−133%
70−75
+133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−127%
50−55
+127%

This is how R9 Fury and RTX 4060 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Ti is 133% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Ti is 130% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 Ti is 129% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.87 59.44
Recency 10 July 2015 18 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 160 Watt

RTX 4060 Ti has a 139% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 71.9% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 Fury in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Radeon R9 Fury
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 173 votes

Rate Radeon R9 Fury on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 8148 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.