Radeon RX Vega 64 vs R9 390 X2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated125
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data23.74
Power efficiencyno data2.87
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGrenadaVega 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 September 2015 (9 years ago)7 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25604096
Core clock speed1000 MHz1247 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1546 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)580 Watt295 Watt
Texture fill rate160.0395.8
Floating-point processing power5.12 TFLOPS12.66 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs160256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
Width3-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors4x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth345.6 GB/s483.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2015 7 August 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 580 Watt 295 Watt

RX Vega 64 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 96.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 390 X2 and Radeon RX Vega 64. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Radeon R9 390 X2
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Radeon RX Vega 64

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 31 vote

Rate Radeon R9 390 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 671 vote

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.