GeForce RTX 4050 vs Radeon R9 390 X2

#ad 
Buy
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated136
Place by popularitynot in top-10045
Power efficiencyno data25.57
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGrenadaAD107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 September 2015 (9 years ago)2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560 ×22560
Core clock speed1000 MHz2505 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2640 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)580 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate160.0 ×2211.2
Floating-point processing power5.12 TFLOPS ×213.52 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×232
TMUs160 ×280
Tensor Coresno data120
Ray Tracing Coresno data18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width3-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors4x 8-pin1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB ×26 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit ×296 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth345.6 GB/s ×2216.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 580 Watt 100 Watt

R9 390 X2 has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4050, on the other hand, has a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 480% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 390 X2 and GeForce RTX 4050. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Radeon R9 390 X2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
GeForce RTX 4050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 36 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2273 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 390 X2 or GeForce RTX 4050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.