ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs R9 380X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
360 OEM 370 370 1024SP 370X 380 380 OEM 380X 390 390 X2 390X 390X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
550v 560v 565v 4650 4670 4670 Mac Edition 5165

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 380X with Mobility Radeon HD 4670, including specs and performance data.

R9 380X
2015, $229
4 GB GDDR5, 190 Watt
14.66
+1221%

R9 380X outperforms Mobility HD 4670 by a whopping 1221% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R9 380X R9 380X
ATI Mobility HD 4670 Mobility HD 4670

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3971126
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.03no data
Power efficiency5.942.44
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameAntiguaM96
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date19 November 2015 (10 years ago)9 January 2009 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048320
Compute units32no data
Core clock speedno data675 MHz
Boost clock speed970 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,000 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate124.221.60
Floating-point processing power3.973 TFLOPS0.432 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs12832
L1 Cache512 KB64 KB
L2 Cache512 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length221 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors​2 x 6-pinno data
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed970 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth182.4 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1210.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.34.1
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 39 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 14.66 1.11
Recency 19 November 2015 9 January 2009
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 35 Watt

R9 380X has a 1221% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 4670, on the other hand, has 443% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 380X is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 380X is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R9 380X Radeon R9 380X
vs
GTX 960 GeForce GTX 960
ATI Mobility HD 4670 Mobility Radeon HD 4670
vs
HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
R9 380X Radeon R9 380X
vs
Arc A380 Arc A380
R7 360E R7 360E
vs
RTX 4060 Max-Q RTX 4060 Max-Q
R7 360E R7 360E
vs
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
R7 360E R7 360E
vs
RTX 3050 A Mobile RTX 3050 A Mobile
R9 380X R9 380X
vs
M2000M M2000M
R9 380X R9 380X
vs
R9 M470X R9 M470X
R9 380X R9 380X
vs
HD 8670A HD 8670A
R9 380X R9 380X
vs
ATI DDR VIVO OEM DDR VIVO OEM
R9 380X R9 380X
vs
Quadro P4200 P4200
R9 380X R9 380X
vs
ATI HD 3850 X3 HD 3850 X3
R9 380X R9 380X
vs
GMA X4700MHD GMA X4700MHD

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 220 votes

Rate Radeon R9 380X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 14 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 380X or Mobility Radeon HD 4670, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.