GMA 3150 vs Radeon R9 370X

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1531
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.05
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameTrinidadPineview
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 August 2015 (9 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128016
Core clock speed980 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,800 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate82.400.8
Floating-point processing power2.637 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs321
TMUs802

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length221 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 August 2015 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 13 Watt

R9 370X has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 1284.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 370X and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 370X is a desktop card while GMA 3150 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 370X
Radeon R9 370X
Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 85 votes

Rate Radeon R9 370X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 141 vote

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.