Quadro4 400 NVS PCI vs Radeon R9 370

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking400not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameTrinidadNV17 A3
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)16 July 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed925 MHz220 MHz
Boost clock speed975 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,800 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate78.000.88
Floating-point performance2.496 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length221 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5600 MHz332 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s5.312 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2x LFH60
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)8.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2015 16 July 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 18 Watt

R9 370 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro4 400 NVS PCI, on the other hand, has 511.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 370 and Quadro4 400 NVS PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 370 is a desktop card while Quadro4 400 NVS PCI is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 370
Radeon R9 370
NVIDIA Quadro4 400 NVS PCI
Quadro4 400 NVS PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 391 vote

Rate Radeon R9 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 400 NVS PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.