FirePro S10000 Passive vs Radeon R9 285

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking368not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.68no data
Power efficiency6.47no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameTongaTahiti
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 September 2014 (11 years ago)12 November 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $3,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17923584 ×2
Core clock speed918 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data950 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rate102.8106.4 ×2
Floating-point processing power3.29 TFLOPS3.405 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs3232 ×2
TMUs112112 ×2
L1 Cache448 KB448 KB
L2 Cache512 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length221 mm305 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/s480 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.21x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+-
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.2.1701.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 September 2014 12 November 2012
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 750 Watt

R9 285 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 295% lower power consumption.

S10000 Passive, on the other hand, has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 285 and FirePro S10000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 285 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro S10000 Passive is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 80 votes

Rate Radeon R9 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate FirePro S10000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 285 or FirePro S10000 Passive, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.