ATI Radeon 7000 vs R9 270X

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3991532
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.59no data
Power efficiency4.85no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameCuracaoRV100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (11 years ago)19 February 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speedno data183 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,800 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate84.000.55
Floating-point processing power2.688 TFLOPSno data
ROPs321
TMUs803

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2 x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data183 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s2.928 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 127.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 270X 4874
+243600%
ATI 7000 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data
Valorant 50−55 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Dota 2 45−50 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Fortnite 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 no data
Valorant 50−55 no data
World of Tanks 170−180 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Dota 2 45−50 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 no data
Valorant 50−55 no data

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 18−20 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12 no data
World of Tanks 90−95 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−33 no data
Forza Horizon 5 20−22 no data
Metro Exodus 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Dota 2 21−24 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 no data
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Dota 2 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 16−18 no data
Fortnite 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 5 9−10 no data
Valorant 12−14 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 October 2013 19 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 23 Watt

R9 270X has an age advantage of 12 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7000, on the other hand, has 682.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 270X and Radeon 7000. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 270X
Radeon R9 270X
ATI Radeon 7000
Radeon 7000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 759 votes

Rate Radeon R9 270X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 195 votes

Rate Radeon 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.