Radeon RX 6650M XT vs R8 M445DX

Place in the ranking	884	83
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	25.47
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Meso	Navi 23
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 May 2016 (8 years ago)	4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	2048
Core clock speed	780 MHz	2068 MHz
Boost clock speed	1021 MHz	2416 MHz
Number of transistors	1,550 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.42	309.2
Floating-point processing power	0.6534 TFLOPS	9.896 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	64
TMUs	20	128
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	IGP	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.0	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R8 M445DX 1.98

RX 6650M XT 42.39
+2041%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R8 M445DX 796

RX 6650M XT 17070
+2044%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−1971%

290−300
+1971%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −1100%	95−100 +1100%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1517%	95−100 +1517%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −2675%	110−120 +2675%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −1100%	95−100 +1100%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1517%	95−100 +1517%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −1918%	220−230 +1918%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −5050%	100−110 +5050%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −2675%	110−120 +2675%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −1100%	95−100 +1100%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1517%	95−100 +1517%
Dota 2	12 −1008%	130−140 +1008%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −636%	100−110 +636%
Fortnite	10−11 −1770%	180−190 +1770%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −1918%	220−230 +1918%
Grand Theft Auto V	6 −2117%	130−140 +2117%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −5050%	100−110 +5050%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	25 −736%	200−210 +736%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5 −3140%	160−170 +3140%
World of Tanks	50 −458%	270−280 +458%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −2675%	110−120 +2675%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −1100%	95−100 +1100%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1517%	95−100 +1517%
Dota 2	21 −533%	130−140 +533%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −636%	100−110 +636%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −1918%	220−230 +1918%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 −945%	200−210 +945%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	0−1	80−85
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −1057%	160−170 +1057%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −4500%	45−50 +4500%
World of Tanks	12−14 −2062%	280−290 +2062%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	75−80
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1500%	45−50 +1500%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −2283%	140−150 +2283%
Forza Horizon 5	2−3 −3650%	75−80 +3650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −1520%	80−85 +1520%
Valorant	8−9 −1738%	140−150 +1738%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −110%	21−24 +110%
Dota 2	16−18 −469%	90−95 +469%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −507%	90−95 +507%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −2350%	140−150 +2350%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −507%	90−95 +507%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −2550%	50−55 +2550%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −110%	21−24 +110%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Dota 2	16−18 −469%	90−95 +469%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −3350%	65−70 +3350%
Fortnite	0−1	65−70
Forza Horizon 5	0−1	40−45
Valorant	2−3 −3850%	75−80 +3850%