ATI Graphics Pro Turbo vs Radeon R8 M445DX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking951not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameMesoMach64
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2016 (9 years ago)1995 (31 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed780 MHz40 MHz
Boost clock speed1021 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm600 nm
Texture fill rate20.42no data
Floating-point processing power0.6534 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs20no data
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedVRAM
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared40 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320.0 MB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.0no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 600 nm

R8 M445DX has a 2043% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R8 M445DX and Graphics Pro Turbo. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R8 M445DX is a notebook graphics card while Graphics Pro Turbo is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 87 votes

Rate Radeon R8 M445DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 17 votes

Rate Graphics Pro Turbo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R8 M445DX or Graphics Pro Turbo, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.