UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs Radeon R7 M520

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated753
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data8.61
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameOlandIce Lake G1 Gen. 11
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)28 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32032
Core clock speed1030 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate20.60no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs20no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth16 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAno data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012_1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 28 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 12 Watt

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has an age advantage of 2 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M520 and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M520 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M520
Radeon R7 M520
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 16 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 366 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.