ATI FireGL V3200 vs Radeon R7 M445

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking906not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.99no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameMesoRV380
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 May 2016 (9 years ago)1 September 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed780 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed920 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15-25 Watt46 Watt
Texture fill rate18.402.000
Floating-point processing power0.5888 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs204
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz350 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s11.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0b
Shader Model6.0no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2016 1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 46 Watt

R7 M445 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364% more advanced lithography process, and 207% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M445 and FireGL V3200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M445 is a notebook graphics card while FireGL V3200 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 123 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M445 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M445 or FireGL V3200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.