Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs Radeon R7 M380

Place in the ranking	676	611
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	14.88
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Tropo	Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	5 May 2015 (9 years ago)	28 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	64
Compute units	10	no data
Core clock speed	900 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	915 MHz	1100 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate	36.60	no data
Floating-point processing power	1.171 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	no data
TMUs	40	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	32 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	no data
Eyefinity	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	-
FreeSync	+	-
HD3D	+	-
PowerTune	+	-
DualGraphics	+	-
ZeroCore	+	-
Switchable graphics	+	-
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12_1
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.4	no data
OpenCL	Not Listed	no data
Mantle	+	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

12−14

−41.7%

17
+41.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

7−8

−28.6%

9−10
+28.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −25%	14−16 +25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Battlefield 5	10−11 −50%	14−16 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −33.3%	12 +33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +33.3%	9 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −38.5%	35−40 +38.5%
Hitman 3	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −20.7%	35−40 +20.7%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −100%	18 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −9.1%	12 +9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −25%	20−22 +25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −25%	55 +25%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −25%	14−16 +25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Battlefield 5	10−11 −50%	14−16 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −22.2%	11 +22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +200%	4 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −38.5%	35−40 +38.5%
Hitman 3	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −20.7%	35−40 +20.7%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −55.6%	14 +55.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 +22.2%	9 −22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −6.3%	17 +6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −18.8%	18−20 +18.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −15.9%	51 +15.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −25%	14−16 +25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −38.5%	35−40 +38.5%
Hitman 3	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +164%	11 −164%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +6.7%	15 −6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +77.8%	9 −77.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −9.1%	45−50 +9.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

−36.4%

14−16
+36.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −114%	14−16 +114%
Hitman 3	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −29.6%	35−40 +29.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

−25%

10−11
+25%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Hitman 3	0−1	2−3
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −450%	10−12 +450%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	2−3

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−20%

6−7
+20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1

This is how R7 M380 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compete in popular games:

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 42% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R7 M380 is 200% faster.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 450% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

R7 M380 is ahead in 6 tests (9%)
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is ahead in 57 tests (85%)
there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.33	5.42
Recency	5 May 2015	28 May 2019
Chip lithography	28 nm	10 nm

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) has a 25.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M380 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.