Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs Radeon R7 M380
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R7 M380 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) outperforms R7 M380 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 688 | 624 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | no data | 14.95 |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
GPU code name | Tropo | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 5 May 2015 (9 years ago) | 28 May 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | 64 |
Compute units | 10 | no data |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 915 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Number of transistors | 1,500 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 12-25 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 36.60 | no data |
Floating-point processing power | 1.171 TFLOPS | no data |
ROPs | 16 | no data |
TMUs | 40 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | no data |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | no data |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Eyefinity | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
AppAcceleration | + | - |
FreeSync | + | - |
HD3D | + | - |
PowerTune | + | - |
DualGraphics | + | - |
ZeroCore | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
OpenCL | Not Listed | no data |
Mantle | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 14−16
−28.6%
| 18
+28.6%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Atomic Heart | 10−11
−50%
|
15
+50%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−25%
|
10−11
+25%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Atomic Heart | 10−11
−20%
|
12
+20%
|
Battlefield 5 | 16−18
−12.5%
|
18
+12.5%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−25%
|
10−11
+25%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12
+9.1%
|
Fortnite | 21−24
−39.1%
|
32
+39.1%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+46.2%
|
13
−46.2%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 8−9
−37.5%
|
10−12
+37.5%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−11.8%
|
18−20
+11.8%
|
Valorant | 55−60
−12.7%
|
60−65
+12.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Atomic Heart | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
+84.6%
|
39
−84.6%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−25%
|
10−11
+25%
|
Dota 2 | 35−40
+20%
|
30
−20%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−12
+10%
|
10
−10%
|
Fortnite | 21−24
−8.7%
|
25
+8.7%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
−21.1%
|
21−24
+21.1%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 8−9
−37.5%
|
10−12
+37.5%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
+44.4%
|
9
−44.4%
|
Metro Exodus | 7−8
+40%
|
5
−40%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−11.8%
|
18−20
+11.8%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
−50%
|
18
+50%
|
Valorant | 55−60
−12.7%
|
60−65
+12.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 16−18
−31.3%
|
21−24
+31.3%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−25%
|
10−11
+25%
|
Dota 2 | 35−40
+28.6%
|
28
−28.6%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−12
+0%
|
11
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
−21.1%
|
21−24
+21.1%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 8−9
−37.5%
|
10−12
+37.5%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−11.8%
|
18−20
+11.8%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+33.3%
|
9
−33.3%
|
Valorant | 55−60
−12.7%
|
60−65
+12.7%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 21−24
+53.3%
|
15
−53.3%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−35
−25.8%
|
35−40
+25.8%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
Metro Exodus | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
−17.2%
|
30−35
+17.2%
|
Valorant | 40−45
−29.5%
|
55−60
+29.5%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−500%
|
6−7
+500%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Far Cry 5 | 7−8
−42.9%
|
10−11
+42.9%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 8−9
−25%
|
10−11
+25%
|
4K
High Preset
Atomic Heart | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−6.3%
|
16−18
+6.3%
|
Valorant | 20−22
−30%
|
24−27
+30%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 2−3 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 12−14
−38.5%
|
18−20
+38.5%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
This is how R7 M380 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compete in popular games:
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 29% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R7 M380 is 85% faster.
- in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 500% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- R7 M380 is ahead in 9 tests (14%)
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is ahead in 49 tests (78%)
- there's a draw in 5 tests (8%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 4.34 | 5.45 |
Recency | 5 May 2015 | 28 May 2019 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) has a 25.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M380 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.