Radeon RX 6600 vs R7 M370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M370 with Radeon RX 6600, including specs and performance data.

R7 M370
2015
4 GB GDDR5
3.68

RX 6600 outperforms R7 M370 by a whopping 968% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking714113
Place by popularitynot in top-10013
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data67.39
Power efficiencyno data20.42
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameLithoNavi 23
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)13 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841792
Core clock speed900 MHz1626 MHz
Boost clock speed960 MHz2491 MHz
Number of transistors690 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data132 Watt
Texture fill rate23.04279.0
Floating-point processing power0.7373 TFLOPS8.928 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs24112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.1
Vulkan-1.2
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 M370 3.68
RX 6600 39.31
+968%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M370 1417
RX 6600 15147
+969%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R7 M370 2524
RX 6600 31774
+1159%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R7 M370 8513
RX 6600 94734
+1013%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 M370 1760
RX 6600 23366
+1228%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 M370 10364
RX 6600 145870
+1307%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 M370 118746
RX 6600 545762
+360%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−707%
113
+707%
1440p5−6
−1040%
57
+1040%
4K2−3
−1450%
31
+1450%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.91
1440pno data5.77
4Kno data10.61

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1429%
107
+1429%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−655%
80−85
+655%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−5550%
113
+5550%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−1475%
120−130
+1475%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−888%
75−80
+888%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1200%
91
+1200%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1114%
85−90
+1114%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−870%
95−100
+870%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−810%
190−200
+810%
Hitman 3 9−10
−1000%
99
+1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−527%
160−170
+527%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−2000%
120−130
+2000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−922%
90−95
+922%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−921%
140−150
+921%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−207%
120−130
+207%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−655%
80−85
+655%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−4500%
92
+4500%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−1475%
120−130
+1475%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−888%
75−80
+888%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−943%
73
+943%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1114%
85−90
+1114%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−870%
95−100
+870%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−810%
190−200
+810%
Hitman 3 9−10
−956%
95
+956%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−527%
160−170
+527%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−2000%
120−130
+2000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−922%
90−95
+922%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−1200%
182
+1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
−212%
80−85
+212%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−207%
120−130
+207%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−655%
80−85
+655%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−3800%
78
+3800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−888%
75−80
+888%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−743%
59
+743%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1114%
85−90
+1114%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−810%
190−200
+810%
Hitman 3 9−10
−856%
86
+856%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−446%
142
+446%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−1021%
157
+1021%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−1400%
90
+1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−38.1%
58
+38.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−922%
90−95
+922%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1300%
40−45
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1433%
45−50
+1433%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1600%
34
+1600%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−10900%
220−230
+10900%
Hitman 3 8−9
−575%
54
+575%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−1033%
102
+1033%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1800%
55−60
+1800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−735%
190−200
+735%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−857%
65−70
+857%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1850%
35−40
+1850%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1550%
30−35
+1550%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1100%
24
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 14
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2600%
50−55
+2600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−2000%
21
+2000%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 52
+0%
52
+0%
Metro Exodus 97
+0%
97
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 101
+0%
101
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 36
+0%
36
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+0%
44
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
+0%
53
+0%

This is how R7 M370 and RX 6600 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 is 707% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600 is 1040% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600 is 1450% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6600 is 10900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6600 is ahead in 63 tests (89%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.68 39.31
Recency 5 May 2015 13 October 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

RX 6600 has a 968.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M370 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M370 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M370
Radeon R7 M370
AMD Radeon RX 6600
Radeon RX 6600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 85 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 9743 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.