Quadro 2000 vs Radeon R7 M370

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M370 with Quadro 2000, including specs and performance data.

R7 M370
2015
4 GB GDDR5
3.67
+49.8%

R7 M370 outperforms 2000 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking711833
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.12
Power efficiencyno data2.75
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameLithoGF106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)24 December 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384192
Core clock speed900 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed960 MHzno data
Number of transistors690 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data62 Watt
Texture fill rate23.0420.00
Floating-point processing power0.7373 TFLOPS0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data178 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz650 MHz
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/s41.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed1.1
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-
CUDA-2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 M370 3.67
+49.8%
Quadro 2000 2.45

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M370 1417
+49.8%
Quadro 2000 946

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data66.56

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Hitman 3 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Hitman 3 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Hitman 3 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
+50%
4−5
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Hitman 3 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

This is how R7 M370 and Quadro 2000 compete in popular games:

  • R7 M370 is 56% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.67 2.45
Recency 5 May 2015 24 December 2010
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

R7 M370 has a 49.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R7 M370 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M370 is a notebook card while Quadro 2000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M370
Radeon R7 M370
NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Quadro 2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 85 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 311 votes

Rate Quadro 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.