Radeon RX 6950 XT vs R7 M365X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M340 M350 M350 2GB M360 M365X M370 M380
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5900 5900 XT 5950 5950 XT 6800 6800 3456SP 6800 XT 6850 XT 6900 6900 XT 6950 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M365X with Radeon RX 6950 XT, including specs and performance data.

R7 M365X
2015
4 GB GDDR5
2.01

6950 XT outperforms R7 M365X by a whopping 3243% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R7 M365X R7 M365X
RX 6950 XT RX 6950 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking93225
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data33.77
Power efficiencyno data15.44
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameLithoNavi 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 May 2015 (11 years ago)10 May 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,099

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3845120
Compute units6no data
Core clock speed900 MHz1925 MHz
Boost clock speed825 MHz2324 MHz
Number of transistors690 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data335 Watt
Texture fill rate23.04743.7
Floating-point processing power0.7373 TFLOPS23.8 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs24320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80
L0 Cacheno data1.3 MB
L1 Cache96 KB1 MB
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Eyefinity+-
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.1
Vulkan-1.3
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 M365X 2.01
RX 6950 XT 67.19
+3243%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M365X 848
Samples: 39
RX 6950 XT 28068
+3210%
Samples: 3666

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6−7
−3533%
218
+3533%
1440p3−4
−4333%
133
+4333%
4K2−3
−4100%
84
+4100%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.04
1440pno data8.26
4Kno data13.08

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 351
+0%
351
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 161
+0%
161
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 349
+0%
349
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 339
+0%
339
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 143
+0%
143
+0%
Far Cry 5 181
+0%
181
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 237
+0%
237
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 318
+0%
318
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 128
+0%
128
+0%
Dota 2 199
+0%
199
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 229
+0%
229
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 172
+0%
172
+0%
Metro Exodus 189
+0%
189
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 376
+0%
376
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 122
+0%
122
+0%
Dota 2 167
+0%
167
+0%
Far Cry 5 164
+0%
164
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 216
+0%
216
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 236
+0%
236
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 153
+0%
153
+0%
Metro Exodus 120
+0%
120
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 93
+0%
93
+0%
Far Cry 5 163
+0%
163
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 58
+0%
58
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 174
+0%
174
+0%
Metro Exodus 77
+0%
77
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 144
+0%
144
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+0%
46
+0%
Dota 2 141
+0%
141
+0%
Far Cry 5 124
+0%
124
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how R7 M365X and RX 6950 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6950 XT is 3533% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6950 XT is 4333% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6950 XT is 4100% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.01 67.19
Recency 5 May 2015 10 May 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

RX 6950 XT has a 3243% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6950 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M365X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M365X is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6950 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 M365X Radeon R7 M365X
vs
HD Graphics 520 HD Graphics 520
RX 6950 XT Radeon RX 6950 XT
vs
RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070
R7 M365X Radeon R7 M365X
vs
HD Graphics 6000 HD Graphics 6000
R7 M365X Radeon R7 M365X
vs
P104-101 P104 101
R7 M365X Radeon R7 M365X
vs
RTX 6000 Passive RTX 6000 Passive
R7 M365X Radeon R7 M365X
vs
ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE All-In-Wonder 9200 SE
R7 M365X Radeon R7 M365X
vs
RTX 3070 RTX 3070
R7 M365X Radeon R7 M365X
vs
9500 GT Rev. 3 GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3
R7 M365X Radeon R7 M365X
vs
RTX 4080 Ti Mobile RTX 4080 Ti Mobile
R7 M365X Radeon R7 M365X
vs
Playstation 5 Pro GPU 5 Pro GPU
R7 A360 Radeon R7 A360
vs
STG STG
R7 A360 Radeon R7 A360
vs
Pro 5600M Pro 5600M
R7 A360 Radeon R7 A360
vs
Xe DG1 LP (iDG1LP) Mobile DG1 LP (iDG1LP) Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.8 57 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M365X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 2992 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6950 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M365X or Radeon RX 6950 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.