GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs Radeon R7 M365X

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M365X and GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R7 M365X
2015
4 GB GDDR5
2.02

RTX 3080 Mobile outperforms R7 M365X by a whopping 1999% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking89495
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.66
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameLithoGA104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)12 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3846144
Compute units6no data
Core clock speed900 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speed825 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors690 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data115 Watt
Texture fill rate23.04296.6
Floating-point processing power0.7373 TFLOPS18.98 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs24192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.0
Vulkan-1.2
Mantle+-
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 M365X 2.02
RTX 3080 Mobile 42.39
+1999%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M365X 785
RTX 3080 Mobile 16447
+1995%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−2280%
119
+2280%
1440p3−4
−2333%
73
+2333%
4K2−3
−2150%
45
+2150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 103
+0%
103
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 134
+0%
134
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 91
+0%
91
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 108
+0%
108
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 261
+0%
261
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 147
+0%
147
+0%
Metro Exodus 108
+0%
108
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Valorant 198
+0%
198
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 86
+0%
86
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 90
+0%
90
+0%
Dota 2 132
+0%
132
+0%
Far Cry 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 213
+0%
213
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 125
+0%
125
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 131
+0%
131
+0%
Metro Exodus 91
+0%
91
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 74
+0%
74
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 111
+0%
111
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 63
+0%
63
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80
+0%
80
+0%
Dota 2 128
+0%
128
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 185
+0%
185
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Valorant 179
+0%
179
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 94
+0%
94
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+0%
94
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 49
+0%
49
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
+0%
21
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 141
+0%
141
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 84
+0%
84
+0%
Metro Exodus 90
+0%
90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+0%
79
+0%
Valorant 134
+0%
134
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Dota 2 93
+0%
93
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 93
+0%
93
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 32
+0%
32
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 93
+0%
93
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+0%
11
+0%
Dota 2 110
+0%
110
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 79
+0%
79
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Valorant 76
+0%
76
+0%

This is how R7 M365X and RTX 3080 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 Mobile is 2280% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 Mobile is 2333% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3080 Mobile is 2150% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.02 42.39
Recency 5 May 2015 12 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm

RTX 3080 Mobile has a 1998.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M365X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M365X
Radeon R7 M365X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 55 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M365X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 808 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.