Radeon RX 5300 vs R7 M275DX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M275DX with Radeon RX 5300, including specs and performance data.

R7 M275DX
2014
3.34

RX 5300 outperforms R7 M275DX by a whopping 489% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking737279
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.72
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 14
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)28 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8961408
Core clock speedno data1327 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1645 MHz
Number of transistorsno data6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data144.8
Floating-point processing powerno data4.632 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data180 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data3 GB
Memory bus widthno data96 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data168.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
−456%
150−160
+456%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−479%
110−120
+479%
Hitman 3 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−483%
140−150
+483%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−477%
75−80
+477%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−475%
230−240
+475%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−479%
110−120
+479%
Hitman 3 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−483%
140−150
+483%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−477%
75−80
+477%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−467%
85−90
+467%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−475%
230−240
+475%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−479%
110−120
+479%
Hitman 3 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−483%
140−150
+483%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−477%
75−80
+477%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−467%
85−90
+467%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−475%
230−240
+475%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%

This is how R7 M275DX and RX 5300 compete in popular games:

  • RX 5300 is 456% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.34 19.67
Recency 4 June 2014 28 May 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

RX 5300 has a 488.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M275DX in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M275DX is a notebook card while Radeon RX 5300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M275DX
Radeon R7 M275DX
AMD Radeon RX 5300
Radeon RX 5300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M275DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 33 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.