UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) vs Radeon R7 M260

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M260 with UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake), including specs and performance data.

R7 M260
2014
4 GB DDR3
1.14

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) outperforms R7 M260 by a whopping 151% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1040751
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameTopazRocket Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 June 2014 (10 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38432
Compute units6no data
Core clock speed940 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed980 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Texture fill rate23.52no data
Floating-point processing power0.7526 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0 x8no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed900 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212_1
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.3no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 M260 1.14
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 2.86
+151%

  • Other tests
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
    • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R7 M260 1897
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 2811
+48.2%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R7 M260 5425
+5.7%
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 5134

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 M260 1067
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 2175
+104%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 M260 5603
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 11315
+102%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−46.2%
19
+46.2%
1440p6−7
−167%
16
+167%
4K3−4
−200%
9
+200%

Cost per frame, $

1080p61.46no data
1440p133.17no data
4K266.33no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Atomic Heart 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Atomic Heart 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Fortnite 3−4
−467%
16−18
+467%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Valorant 30−35
−88.2%
64
+88.2%
Atomic Heart 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−107%
55−60
+107%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Dota 2 16−18
−106%
35
+106%
Fortnite 3−4
−467%
16−18
+467%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−200%
6
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−125%
9−10
+125%
Valorant 30−35
−50%
51
+50%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Dota 2 16−18
−88.2%
32
+88.2%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−200%
9−10
+200%
Valorant 30−35
−41.2%
45−50
+41.2%
Fortnite 3−4
−467%
16−18
+467%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 4−5
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
−229%
21−24
+229%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−117%
24−27
+117%
Valorant 4−5
−800%
36
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Fortnite 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Atomic Heart 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Valorant 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Dota 2 1−2
−1100%
12
+1100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Fortnite 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how R7 M260 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 46% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 167% faster in 1440p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 1100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is ahead in 44 tests (80%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (20%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.14 2.86
Recency 11 June 2014 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) has a 150.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M260 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M260 is a notebook card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M260
Radeon R7 M260
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1
227 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9
8 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M260 or UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.